By In Stuff


WASHINGTON — The Baltimore Orioles players used to call Davey Johnson “Dum Dum,” because he was so smart. That’s how baseball nicknames work sometimes, irony and all, you know … big guys called “Tiny,” and so forth. Johnson wasn’t just smart, he said smart things all the time — things that baffled everyone else. Dave McNally, the old Orioles pitcher, tells Jim Kaat this great story about the time he was pitching and Johnson walked over from second base and picked up the rosin bag.

“You’re pitching from an unfavorable deviation,” Johnson said.

“Huh?” McNally replied.

“You keep pitching to either side of the plate. That’s an unfavorable deviation. The way your ball is moving, it should offer a favorable deviation. You should throw to the middle of the plate and let it move to either side. That’s a favorable deviation.”

Then, Johnson threw down the rosin bag, jogged back to second base and left McNally on the mound with that cartoon bubble full of question marks hovering over his head.
Well, Johnson loved that statistical stuff — so much so that he studied at Johns Hopkins and Texas A&M and eventually got his degree in mathematics from Trinity. He has said many times that in his playing days he did not think about being a manager, and yet, at the same time, he CONSTANTLY thought about being a manager. That is to say that he did not have any concrete plan to manage, but every game he thought: Why is he pulling the pitcher here? Why isn’t he bunting here? Why is the defense shifting that way?

For most of his playing career, the “he” Johnson observed was Earl Weaver, perhaps the greatest strategic manager the game has known. Johnson didn’t ask many questions — it was his efforts to talk deviations with Weaver that got him the “Dum Dum” nickname in the first place — but he marveled at the way Weaver would manage a game, marveled at how often the right guy seemed to be coming to the plate or the way the baseball would so often get hit at the Orioles’ best defenders in the key moments. He found himself filing stuff away, because that’s the way his mind worked.

When his playing career ended — this after playing in Japan for a while — he was desperate to stay in the game, and he was hired to manage the Miami Amigos of the short-lived Inter-American League (which had teams in Panama, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic and Venezuela). His team won 51 of 72 games before the league folded. He managed the Mets’ Double-A team, then managed the Mets’ Triple-A Tidewater team that had Darryl Strawberry and Ron Darling, then he became manager of the New York Mets.

And for some reason, Davey Johnson — who as a player had been called Dum Dum for his overbearing smarts — was suddenly viewed very differently. Suddenly, and it has been this way now for about three decades, people stopped talking about how smart Davey Johnson is. People stopped appreciating how statistically minded he is, or how well he sets up games or, honestly, how good he is at his job.

In fact, for all these years people have found themselves wondering: “How does this guy win everywhere?”

* * *

You probably know the Johnson record. But in case you don’t, here’s a quick glance:

New York Mets
• The year before he took over the Mets, the team went 68-94.
• He led the team to a 90-win season in his first year, 98 wins in his second, and the next year he managed the 1986 Mets, one of the greatest teams in baseball history, to 108 victories and a World Series title. The Mets won 92, 100 and 87 games in his final three full years, and he was canned after 42 games in 1990.
• The year after he was fired by the Mets, the team lost 84 games, then 90, then 103.

Cincinnati Reds
• Reds general manager Jim Bowden fired Cincinnati hero Tony Perez 44 games into the 1993 season. To call those Reds, owned by Marge Schott, kind of dysfunctional is to call India “kind of populous.”
• After finishing out that season, Johnson led the Reds to a 66-48 record during the strike season (they were in first place in the division) and then an 85-59 record and an appearance in the NLCS against the Braves. Johnson was promptly let go for reasons that had nothing to do with baseball; I was working in Cincinnati at the time and was told by numerous sources (and this was also reported by others) that Schott did not approve of Johnson living with his fiancée before the wedding.
• The year after Johnson left, Ray Knight took over as manager and the Reds finished .500. They then had two consecutive losing records, and did not make the playoffs for 15 seasons.

Baltimore Orioles
• In 1995, the year before Johnson took over, the Orioles had a losing record and had not been in the playoffs since winning the 1983 World Series.
• The Orioles won 88 and 98 games in his two years as manager, reaching the postseason in both years. As if working for Marge Schott had not been enough, now Johnson worked for Peter Angelos, and the two openly despised each other. Johnson got into a complicated argument with Angelos over a Roberto Alomar fine, but according to people close to the situation, if it had not been that it would have been something else. Johnson resigned under pressure.
• The year after Johnson left, the Orioles had a losing record … and would for the next 13 years.

Los Angeles Dodgers
• The year before Johnson took over, the Dodgers had a winning record, but two managers.
• Johnson suffered his first losing record as a manager in 1999 and led the Dodgers to 86 wins in his second year. It was not enough to keep his job.
• The Dodgers stayed at about that level the next year, winning 86 games again.

Washington Nationals
• The year before Johnson took over, the Nationals lost 93 games, and 100 in each of the two seasons before that. He was hired in the middle of the 2011 season when manager Jim Riggleman resigned over a fight with management. At the time, there was a lot of talk about Johnson being too old, too out of touch to manage again.
• This year, he led Washington to the best record in baseball and the city’s first postseason appearance in almost 80 years.

Of those who have managed 1,000 games since 1900, only Joe McCarthy, Bill Southworth, Frank Chance, John McGraw, Earl Weaver, Al Lopez and Fred Clarke have a higher winning percentage than Davey Johnson’s .584. Do you know what those seven men above him have in common? Right. All seven are in the Hall of Fame.

* * *
Maybe it’s because Davey Johnson doesn’t have a noticeable quirk that people have overlooked his astonishing managerial record. He doesn’t hit pitchers eighth, he doesn’t kick dirt on umpires*, and he doesn’t have a certain style that follows him from team to team. His best Reds team led the league in stolen bases. His 1986 Mets were 10th in the league. His 1988 Mets were second in the league in complete games and first in ERA. This year’s Nationals were 10th in complete games (only three all year) and first in ERA.

*He tried some of that anger stuff when he first came to the Mets and found that it didn’t work for him.

He has never been much for sacrifice bunts (“I don’t like giving up outs”) but he’s not obsessive about it. He’s usually near the bottom in intentional walks too, but again, not so much that it makes him stand out. With the Reds, he used a lot of defensive replacements; with the Dodgers, almost none.

So what marks him as a manager? Well, I covered him for those two years in Cincinnati, and I remember so many little things — his calm when the team lost, his consistency in every situation, his ability to defuse little problems before they got bigger, his knack for staying in the background except when the team needed cover. It was so subtle that I really didn’t notice it until the year after he was gone, when the friendly and well-meaning Ray Knight simply could not replicate his success.

More than anything, though, I remember how he just kept going through the madness. Those Marge Schott Reds teams — never been any other like them. Before each game would start, Schott would come down to the field with her dog and have this exact exchange with Johnson:

Schott: Hi honey.
Johnson: Hello Mrs. Schott.
Schott: Say hello to Schottzie.
Johnson: Hello Schottzie.

There was a lot of craziness like that. To simply get through that kind of goofiness would have tested anyone … but Johnson didn’t just get through it, he led the team to back-to-back first place finishes, even though he knew the last few weeks that he would be fired “How’s it going today Davey?” I would ask him.

“Not too high, not too low,” he would say, with a hint of a smile on his face.

In other words, what I remembered was his presence more than his strategy. He was strategically sound. He ran a good bullpen. His teams played energetic baseball. But it was that presence that has stuck with me.

And maybe that hasn’t changed. I asked a close Nationals observer what Johnson has done so well this year, and he told a little story that has a lot more to do with presence than anything else. In July, the Nationals were a huge surprise … but there were plenty of people who did not expect the winning to last. Washington started a four-game series against the Braves, the team in second place at the time, and promptly blew a 9-0 lead, eventually losing 11-10 in extra innings.

How did Johnson respond? He told the press that he had managed the worst game of his life. He could not believe how bad he had been as a manager. “Obviously, when they score 10 runs, that’s my fault,” he said. And “I’ve got to live with it.”

“It was genius,” the observer said. “He took every bit of the responsibility. He didn’t say a single word about the players. He didn’t say a single word about how they had to move on and forget it. He took all the blame. He talked about how he had let the guys down. And they split the series, and took off from there.”

In August, Johnson said that if the team didn’t win the National League East, they could fire him.

And here in October, the Nationals suffered crushing back-to-back losses to St. Louis, the second of those on the biggest baseball day in the city’s history. Davey Johnson has not won a World Series in 26 years. He has not managed in the playoffs in 15 years. He has bounced all around the game — managing amateur teams (including the Netherlands national team) and an Olympic teams and summer league teams. He has been fired for feuds he did not want. He has been crushed on the back pages of the New York Post. He has won everywhere he has been. He started this managing thing when he was 40. He’s now almost 70.

And what did he do after those losses? He did nothing. There was no team meeting called. There were no key changes in the lineup or the schedule. “I don’t believe in having pep rallies,” he said before Thursday’s NLDS Game 4. There was a time when Dum Dum Johnson would try to dazzle everyone with his mathematical knowledge and baseball intelligence. That time is long gone. “My job is just not to screw ’em up,” he says.

His Nationals went out and played a tight, crisp game, winning 2-1 on Jayson Werth’s homer in the ninth. The series goes to Game 5. What happens now? No way for Davey to know. He only knows this about baseball after all these years: Not too high. Not too low.

Print Friendly

34 Responses to Davey

  1. joobie says:

    did mcnally win that game? what’s the end of the story?

    • Sashhenka says:

      If you find yourself unable to understand the mathematical concept of deviation, perhaps you should skip over references.

    • joobie says:

      not only do i understand the mathematical concept, i understand the human concept of not being a jerk when someone is curious about the reference.

    • Tony says:

      I love Davey. The Nats wouldn’t be where they were without him. He’s made some great calls this year. However, he blew it last night in game 5 for not pulling Storen after he gave up that first walk. The pressure on him to not blow it must have been overwhelming. You could tell because it took forever for him to pitch every ball.I know he had 2 outs, but come on he just gave up the hit to tie the game—how could he still leave him in to try to close it out. He must have been psychologically crushed after that one. Sorry Davey but that loss is on you…….

  2. Gil says:

    “Then, Johnson threw down the rosin bag, jogged back to second base and left McNally on the mound . . .”

    That, my friend, is the end of the story.

  3. WFY says:

    “In August, Johnson said that if the team didn’t win the National League East, they could fire him.”

    He said that in spring training too.

  4. J.R. Granger says:

    I like Johnson and this is an interesting profile, but let’s be honest, he walked into two pretty nice situations with the Mets (Gooden, Strawberry, et al emerging just as Johnson took over the helm) and the Nationals (young players emerging plus solid offseason acquisitions). He has never been asked to take over a team that was bottoming out and build them up, he has always taken teams that have fairly high talent levels already and were primed to make the jump.

    • John Autin says:

      The ’83 Mets (before Johnson) went 68-94 — with Strawberry, with Keith Hernandez most of the year, with Tom Seaver pitching pretty well, with Jesse Orosco having a superb year.

      In ’84, they added Gooden and went 21-10 in his starts. Ron Darling took Seaver’s place, with a slight dropoff in performance. No other big names or talents were added. And they went from 68 wins to 90, and exceeded their Pythagorean projection by 12 wins.

      I don’t know how primed the Nats were when he took over in 2011. The team’s 39-37 record under Riggleman was the product of one good streak; they were in last place at 27-36, then won 12 of 13, Riggleman decided to push for an extension and got fired. Seems like a dicey situation to me.

      Some of the rising talent Davey inherited hasn’t helped him this year. C Wilson Ramos missed most of the year. Werth missed half the year while trying to bounce back from a lousy 2011. Mike Morse missed the first 50 games and hasn’t shown the same power. Who knew Harper was ready? Doesn’t a manager deserve a little credit for handling a 19-year-old?

      Of their top 5 SPs in 2011, Marquis was dealt last year, Livan was let go, Lannan was sent to the minors, Gorzelanny was sent to the bullpen. Yes, Zimmermann has continued to develop, and Strasburg came back, and Gio was added; I’m not making light of those talents. But it’s not as though Johnson was handed a pennant-ready team this year, the way, say, Leyland and Scioscia and Washington were.

      Even with talent, winning consistently is no mean feat. Many teams that were primed to make the jump from losers to winners don’t get off the ground.

    • J.R. Granger says:

      I don’t disagee – as I said, I like Johnson. What I’m saying is that he has never been handed a team like, say, the Astros next year. His situations were always pretty good. He certainly made the most of them and his effect in steering the talent that his teams have had should be appreciated.

    • Rob Smith says:

      As much as I don’t want to give Johnson credit, I was sure the Nationals would collapse in the second half, especially after blowing that 9-0 game. Young team. Plenty of injuries. A good pitching staff, but it didn’t look like the best in the league. A decent lineup, but not one that scares you. But they seemed to never lose. The Braves would get on a win streak & LOSE ground. Johnson must be part of the equation. The Nationals really aren’t that talented.

  5. Josh says:

    “This year, he led Washington to the best record in baseball and the city’s first postseason appearance in almost 80 years.”

    This is only true if the Negro Leagues didn’t exist.

    I don’t use this phrase often, and I think it’s arrogant of me to say so, but I expected better from you, Joe.

    • Chris M says:

      oh stop. He obviously meant MLB, which is what 99.9% of fans think of.

    • JohnG says:

      Stay gold Josh, thanks for adding some high quality content to the comments section.

    • Frank says:

      So what was Joe supposed to say there? I suppose he could have given some obligatory, parenthetical remark which merely would have come off as if to say “unless you want to count the Homestead Grays.” Otherwise, he has to go off on some tangent that detracts from the story.

    • Vidor says:

      “it’s arrogant of me to say so”

      Yes. Yes it is.

    • mickey says:

      You wouldn’t want Joe going off on tangents* in these posts.

      *As his good friend Ken Tremendous might say, that would be distracting

    • Josh says:

      If he had written “first MLB postseason appearance” I wouldn’t have said a word.

      The Homestead Grays existed. Their first baseman is in the Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum in Cooperstown.

      “Smooth-fielding, sweet-swinging first baseman Walter Buck Leonard was the backbone of the Homestead Grays dynasty of the late 1930s and 1940s. Even-tempered, modest and loyal, the left-handed hitting Leonard was a model of consistency and one of the best pure hitters to play in the Negro leagues. He played in a record 11 East-West All-Star games, and his remarkable 17-year tenure with the Grays is the longest term of service with one team in Negro league history.”

      It’s an error to say there has not been postseason baseball in Washington in 80 years. There was. It happened. And Joe knows it.

    • Gil says:

      Are you familiar with the term “trainspotter”?

    • Rob Smith says:

      Yeah, I’m sure everyone remembers those incredible Homestead Grays. How silly of Joe not to remember them.

  6. Sean says:

    Maybe it’s my bias as a Dodger fan, but I just don’t understand the love affair with Davey Johnson. Everyone seems to gloss over that Dodger stint, but they were better before he got there and better after he left. They went from 86 to 77 wins in his first year as Joe mentions and then after he left they won 86, 92, 85 and 93 games led by Jim Tracy who everyone agrees is a lousy manager (so pretty much as well or better in each of the next few years). Plus in that time they lost their best hitter (Sheffield) and their best pitcher (Kevin Brown) started to get hurt on a regular basis. So, you could argue they had more talent with Johnson and still did no better. Now he probably was very good early in his career, but I’m not convinced that is still the case. And I’m not ready to give him that much credit for the Nationals improvement as it’s a very talented team that many still considered the favorite in the NL even without a pitcher of the caliber of Strausberg.

    • Mark says:

      Who are these “many” that picked Washington as the favorite in the NL?

    • Rob Smith says:

      Sean, I think the think that’s being missed is that Managers are a bit overrated. They have to manage the clubhouse and not overwork the pitching staff. Otherwise, like Johnson said, it’s the manager’s job to stay out of the way and not mess it up. (Something maybe Bobby Valentine could stand to learn). In the end, you can’t win without talent & players that really want to win. Those Dodger teams were not very good. Not much a manager can do about that.

    • Dinky says:

      In 1998, Fox traded away the best home grown Dodger hitter, the *only* home grown hitter the Dodgers have brought up in my lifetime of more than 50 years rooting for them, Mike Piazza. Fan support evaporated. I stopped going to games. Fans rooted against Kevin Brown, an expensive (and generally effective) acquisition intended to try to make up for the mistake of trading Piazza. Fans rooted against Davey Johnson for the same reason. It took a lot of years and two ownership changes before I felt good about the Dodgers again. I don’t blame Davey Johnson; I blame Fox. It’s hard to win when your home games are, at best, played in a neutral atmosphere.

  7. Pig.Pen says:

    I’ve been watching baseball for 30 years, played Independent ball and overseas and as a Nationals fan and Giants fan growing up, I’ve never seen a manager as good as DJ. There’s not a lot of hype to him, he just always makes the right decision. Definitely belongs in the HOF, without a doubt.

  8. As a Cardinal fan growing up in the 1980s, it was my duty to detest Davey Johnson. It was a duty I gladly accepted.

    If the Nats beat my beloved Birds tonight, I suppose it would be my duty to hate him again. It would be a little harder this time though; I simply respect him as a manager far too much.

    Nice piece, Joe.

  9. sourcreamus says:

    There should be a way to quantify how much affect a manager has on a team. Maybe you could take actual record vs pythagorean record over a career, or take players WAR playing for a certain manager against playing for another manager.With as many baseball loving nerds out there one of them has to find a way to quantify managing.

  10. sourcreamus says:

    This comment has been removed by the author.

  11. NatsLady says:

    It took me a while to get on what I call the “Davey Train.” I detested Riggleman, but when Davey first started managing he didn’t listen to McCatty (pitching coach) and they had some visible fights in the dugout. Davey backed down, learned who his pitchers were, and got a LOT better at managing the bullpen. He still has a tendency to leave starters in too long but some of that is “confidence building.” He was VERY careful with the bullpen this year, didn’t overuse anyone, not even Clippard. What helped is there are no duds in the bullpen. We had a mop-up guy but they sent him down to AA to become a starter.

    He also had a strategy, what he called his “A” and “B” pens. It didn’t work perfectly but it gave everyone an idea where they stood. I don’t think Davey likes the “closer” thing, but in the end he has had to adhere to it, though he prefers “9th inning man.”

    Davey spent about 2/3 of the season learning his players, and overcoming the injuries. For the last 1/3 he has kept the line-up, the rotation, and the bullpen remarkably stable. He’s a big believer in roles, in guys knowing what they are supposed to do and when. He’s amazingly predictable, sort of the anti-Showalter. Anyone who has watched the Nats knows which reliever he’s going to use, which pinch-hitter, etc. (Showalter is also amazing, and he’s trained his guys to “expect the unexpected.” Complete contrast of styles–also different talent, of course.)

  12. A DC Wonk says:

    I’ve been a Davey fan since the early 1980’s. He’s genius, can see the big picture, and is straight with players and earns their trust. They’d run through a wall for him.

    Oh, and the day he got fired (resigned under pressure) by Angelos? Later that day he won manager of the year.

  13. Alina says:

    Nice site you have got here. Will keep coming reading these good articles you are going to write. Maybe you want to check out Remove Background website.

  14. David bone says:

    I hope you have a nice day! Very good article, well written and very thought out. I am looking forward to reading more of your posts in the future.hgh

  15. simplecall says:

    I wanted to know how to make cheapest way to Call India from US and cut the cost of my phone bills.

  16. Will keep coming reading these good articles you are going to write.
    Dissertation writing free

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *