By In Stuff

A Thoroughly Enjoyable Season

Well, it’s Sept. 17 … and the Kansas City Royals have a shot at the postseason. It’s a bit of a longshot, sure. They are 2 1/2 games behind Texas in the wildcard standings right now, which is hardly insurmountable (especially the way the Rangers are playing). But they also have Cleveland and Baltimore ahead of them, and the Yankees tied with them. That makes the math difficult.

Basically, when you play it out, the Royals are something like a 24-to-1 shot to reach the postseason. But, hey, when you look at the Royals the last 25 or so years, a 24-to-1 shot on Sept. 17 is a bleeping miracle.

Anyway, even assuming they do fall short, it really doesn’t change the headline. It has been a thoroughly enjoyable season.

I’ve written this before: It was Jason Kendall who finally broke my spirits. Well, not Kendall himself — Jason was a really good player as a young man — but the idea of him. The Royals signed Jason Kendall on December 11, 2009. Not coincidentally, that was the day I became convinced that the Kansas City Royals would never, ever do anything right.

Kendall was about to turn 36 when the Royals signed him. His slugging percentage the previous two seasons was .313. I want to repeat now — that was his SLUGGING PERCENTAGE. The Royals were coming off a 97-loss season weighed down by a bunch of 30-something veterans spreading the presence all over the place. Forget that the Royals did not learn any lessons from another dreadful season. They did not seem to even know there were lessons to be learned.

Kendall was only the latest in decades of bafflement. The Royals had given Jose Guillen $12 million a year for reasons that, I assume, are locked in a secret file somewhere in the bowels of Kauffman Stadium.* They had not only traded for Yuniesky Betancourt, they brought him back later. They signed Chuck Knoblauch when he was done, Reggie Sanders when he was done. Juan Gonzalez. Jose Lima, Mike Jacobs, Ross Gload, Sidney Ponson. On and on and on and on.

*The “Why KC signed Guillen” file is only one page long and has but one word written on it — “RBIs!”

And then … Kendall … it was the pitch that broke the camel’s bat. Kendall was typically gamey, he showed up ready to play, he refused to sit, and in the 490 plate appearances he managed before finally expiring, he did not hit even one triple or home run. It was all hopeless. The Royals were lost at sea. Of course, they had been lost forever. The despairing part was they seemed to have no particular desire to be found.

And here we are, less then four years later, and the reason this Royals team has been so enjoyable is not only that they are winning more than they are losing. That’s great. It’s not only that they are mathematically alive for a playoff spot. That’s great too. It is that the Royals, for the first time in almost two generations, are heading toward land. I don’t just feel good for them. I’m oddly proud of them.

At the start of the year, it looked to be a typically miserable year. The Royals made the controversial Wil Myers for James Shields trade, which looked pretty bad when they made it and, I suspect, will look progressively worse as years go on. They penciled Jeff Francoeur into the starting lineup. They thrust young Eric Hosmer into the coveted third spot in the lineup though he was coming off a dismal season. They seemed serious about returning Luke Hochevar to the rotation though he had proven pretty conclusively that he would never be even an average big league starter. And then, after getting off to a quick start, they went into this death spiral where they lost 19 of 23 games and descended into the abyss of last place in the American League Central. For way too long, they were leading off Chris Getz. Manager Ned Yost seemed to be overmatched. Another year in Kansas City.

Only, there was something different. I didn’t like the Shields for Myers deal … and still don’t. But there was something CALCULATED about it. Something LOGICAL about it. The Royals had determined that with a couple of good starters, they could take a leap forward. I was just talking about this with Arizona reliever Brad Ziegler, who grew up in Missouri, and he said this: “Look, we all know that Wil Myers is going to be a superstar. The ROYALS knew it. But James Shields is amazing. He throws eight innings every time out.”

It’s not quite that … but close. Shields leads the American League in innings pitched. Take away one dreadful start against Detroit, he has a sub-3.00 ERA. His 25 quality starts — no matter how you may feel about that stat — is second-highest for the Royals since the strike, behind only Zack Greinke’s absurdly good 2009 Cy Young season. Truth is, Shields really has pitched better than I thought he would. He has pitched just as well as the Royals thought he would. He has been exactly what the Royals hoped he would be — a metronome for a team learning how to keep time. Do I think that was worth Wil Myers? No. Do I think they will regret the deal longterm? Yes. But the Royals made a calculated decision to step forward now. And they are stepping forward.

They moved Luke Hochevar to the bullpen. If you are not a Royals fan, this will mean nothing to you — Hochevar struggled, OF COURSE they moved him to the bullpen, right? Big deal. But, you see, that’s not how the Royals work. The Royals have simply refused to move on from their mistakes. This is a team that gave Kyle Davies start after start after start in the hopelessly misguided belief that something would kick in. Davies made 99 starts for Kansas City — his ERA was 5.34 for those starts. Hochevar — who flashed good stuff and was also the first pick in the 2006 draft* — seemed to have Supreme Court job security.

*Ahead of — I’ve done this list so many times I can do it in my sleep — Evan Longoria, Clayton Kershaw, Tim Lincecum and Max Scherzer, to name only a few. Soon, I suspect, we will have a trivia question: In the first round of the 2006 draft, three Cy Young winners were selected. Who was the FIRST PICK of that draft?

But, the Royals moved Hochevar to the bullpen, where — as an added bonus — he has been brilliant. I think that was really the first time I looked at this team and thought: “Hey, wait a minute, Dayton Moore and the guys might have figured some things out.” My last line in that Hochevar post was this: “The Royals aren’t doubling down on their mistake. And that, I think, is a good sign that things are really changing in Kansas City.”

They got rid of Jeff Francoeur. Again a seemingly obvious move — Frenchy was hitting .208 at the time — but obvious moves have befuddled the Royals for years. Everybody loves Francoeur, and so the Royals of old would have stuck with him in a naive hope that his good attitude and consistent effort would help him hit baseballs. The Royals went into their system and pulled up a longtime minor leaguer named David Lough and let him play. Lough is a tough guy, can play all three outfield spots and play them pretty well, can offer a little something with the bat, it’s like the Royals finally grasped the concept of replacement players.

They moved Eric Hosmer to the No. 2 spot in the lineup. I’ve written about this before and don’t want to make too much of it because lineup stuff tends to be ridiculously overvalued — but this move also cut against the Royals decision-making history. Hosmer is a big first baseman who is supposed to have outrageous power … the Royals have been constitutionally opposed to hitting a guy like that second. But they did it with Hosmer when he was struggling, and (I suspect) told him to just relax, not worry about home runs, see the ball hit the ball, let his natural talents take over. Whatever the reason, Hosmer is having a wonderful rebound season — he’s hitting .302/.356/.448 after a dreadful start — and you can begin to see the outline of the star the Royals and scouts have expected Hosmer to become.

The bullpen is a spectacular array of golden arms the Royals have acquired through the years. This is the Dayton Moore philosophy of stockpiling great arms at work. Moore had hoped it would materialize in the starting rotation more quickly (though Danny Duffy and Yordano Ventura offer exciting possibilities for next season and beyond). Instead, it has come to life in the bullpen — the Royals might have the best bullpen in the league. In fact, I’m not sure there’s any question. The Royals bullpen has a 2.54 ERA and 451 strikeouts in 426 innings.The league is hitting .220 against this bullpen. It’s electrifying.

And the bullpen is almost all homegrown. Closer Greg Holland (43 saves, 1.33 ERA, 94 Ks in 61 innings) was a 10th round pick out of Western Carolina. Hochevar (1.64 ERA, 76 strikeouts, 16 walks) we’ve talked about. Kelvin Herrera, who has struggled at times this year but throws 100 mph and can be absurdly dominant, was signed by the Royals in the Dominican Republic as a 16-year-old.

Little lefty Tim Collins came over in the Rick Ankiel trade (yes, for once the Royals were trading someone like Rick Ankiel AWAY), Will Smith came over in the Alberto Callaspo deal, Aaron Crow was a first-round mistake (sheesh, Mike Trout was RIGHT THERE) but the Royals did not compound the mistake by trying to make a starter out of him. He’s a pretty good reliever with a a power arm. Louis Coleman was a fifth-round pick out of the marvelously named Pillow Academy. He has an 0.35 ERA in 23 appearances.That’s right. One run allowed all year.

The Royals are not a great team. They are hopelessly powerless — their 104 home runs is 29 fewer than any team in the American League. They are 11th in the league in runs scored, and they have players in their every day lineup with OPS+ of 55 (Alcides Escobar), 76 (Mike Moustakas), 83 (Lorenzo Cain) and whatever dreadful numbers their second baseman is putting up. Their starting rotation barely goes three deep — and they’ve basically been saved by the left-handed stylings of Maestro Bruce Chen.

But they are a good team. And there is reason to believe they will be a better team. There is young pitching coming. The minor league system is still pretty stocked. Guys like Salvador Perez and Hosmer are just entering their prime, Billy Butler and Alex Gordon should still be in it. They play great defense. They are athletic. They have a direction and purpose.

And — man is this a great thing to say — they finally seem to know what they’re doing. It’s not that I agree with everything they do — I don’t. I’m not sure Ned Yost is the manager to take them to the next level. I’m not sure how the rotation will come together (right now, they’re counting on FOUR thirty-somethings). I don’t know if the bullpen can be this great again. I don’t know if they will hit enough … and, because of that, I do think the Wil Myers trade will look worse and worse if he becomes the MVP type hitter he just might become.

But, none of that is the point. The last couple of weeks could be a lot of fun if the Royals can win a few games, but that’s all gravy. The point is the Royals are finally pointing North. Yes, it has been a thoroughly enjoyable season.

Print Friendly

14 Responses to A Thoroughly Enjoyable Season

  1. I know how you feel. I’m from Baltimore. Last year all the national media could talk about with the Orioles was run differential. The national media is used to thinking about the Red Sox and Yankees. They don’t really know what it’s like to follow a bad team for years and years and years.

    Just being in a race, just getting a single playoff game, man, it’s the greatest thing. Hope you experience it. Not at the expense of the Orioles of course. But Texas fans, they’re spoiled.

    • Not that I’m criticizing the sentiment, but it’s funny how fans of a team with 5.5 playoff appearances and no championships in its 40+-year history could be considered “spoiled” by anyone.

      I don’t expect this season to end with a playoff game, but I’ve been wrong about this team many times this year. I’m trying to keep my expectations low, but I am really enjoying being in it late in the year.

    • Mr. Stephens: When looking at the teams fighting for the AL Wild Card, you’ve got Texas, Tampa Bay, Cleveland, Baltimore, the Evil Empire and Kansas City.

      If Kansas City is to make it, somebody has to miss. I’m not going to root against Baltimore; you will, of course, but we’re talking about my original comment. So who else are you going to root against? The Evil Empire, of course. Cleveland? No, they’ve suffered enough. Tampa Bay? No, I’d like to see them actually win the thing, especially with that payroll. Who does that leave? It’s a zero-sum game.

      I think we all agree that just being in the race is a blessing.

  2. James Smyth says:

    Nice column!

    As you noted, Kershaw (7th overall pick), Lincecum (10th) and Scherzer (11th) were first-round choices in 2006. Only one other draft round has produced two Cy Young winners and fittingly, it’s two guys who would end up inextricably linked in their Hall of Fame careers…

    Greg Maddux and Tom Glavine both went in the second round of the 1984 draft. Maddux third overall to the Cubs, Glavine 19th to the Braves.

  3. BobDD says:

    Has Dayton Moore really expunged himself of the love of Francoeur, Yuni, Getz and the like? And if so (big if I’d say), has he merely changed now to thinking he needs to make more moves like the Shields trade, or as it will most likely be known as for rest of franchise history – the unbelievable Myers giveaway? What repeatable skill has GMDM shown that gives you confidence that this coming off-season’s moves will put KC over that final hump to perennial pennant threat? There is every right to expect meaningful improvement with no trades/free agent signings at all because there are returning pitchers (Duffy, Paulino) and room for current hitters to improve. But with substantial holes currently at 2B, RF, and SP, Moore is most likely to make a trade and free agent signing in his trademark rush (first trade of the off-season). Based on his track record, I cannot expect any moves he makes to have a positive outcome. As you’ve said, even the Shields trade, as good as it is, will most likely be horrible in the long term. I have hopes of course, but have learned to hold off on expectations. As friendly and as good in some things Moore is, I think there is enough of a record now to see that he does not get it. I’d love to have him in my Strat league though because we always appreciate volunteers for the cellar.

  4. “supreme court *job* security”

  5. The “logic” of the Myers/Shields trade was the same “logic” used in the Jones/Bedard trade. Both trades were horrible.

  6. irishguy says:

    Bottom line is this. You don’t make the Myers trade, then the Royals start the season with Hochevar and Chen in the rotation, along with Mendoza.

    They also, in very un-Royal like fashion, committed $12 million and a minor league reliever to get Santana, and threw a pretty hefty contract at Guthrie to keep him.

    Consider the 2013 Royals without Shields, Santana and Guthrie.

    As for the Myers deal, I hope Myers does become a superstar. But that is no given, especially at the rate he continues to strike out. That said, we’ve seen Damon come up from the minors. We’ve seen Sweeney. We’ve seen Beltran. We’ve seen Gordon, Butler, Hosmer, Moustakas and Perez.

    None of it ever made any difference without starting pitching.

    • Edgar Bergen says:

      James Shields is 12-9. I love the guy too, and I don’t mean to imply that record is that important in pitching. I really like to watch him pitch. However, 12-9 is not that good. Myers plays everyday; Shields only every 5. Starting pitching is important, but there is no one in the Royals lineup that can hit with power . . . no one.

      I’d rather have had Myers than Shields, even at the start of the year. Remember too that the GM has forced Yost to trot Davis out there every fifth day despite the fact that he can’t pitch. So there is no way that Shields plus Davis (7-11) comes close to Myers.

      Bottom line is that the Rays will make it to the playoffs and the Royals will not.

    • irishguy says:

      The Royals are also 19-13 in games James Shields has started, and 61-59 in games he hasn’t started. And mixed in with those 13 losses are a lot of starts in which Shields went deep and very much put the Royals in a position to win.

      Myers could be a stud. Some day. At the moment, he appears to be going through the learning curve all young hitters go through. And as such, he was, while with the Royals, just one more in a long line of “prospects” dating back to Johnny Damon and Michael Tucker, who were going to single-handedly revive the franchise immediately upon arrival.

      As for “David can’t pitch,” well maybe not as a starter. But in five September relief appearances, he has a 1.50 ERA and opposing hitters are hitting .143 off him.

    • Edgar Bergen says:

      We’ll just have to disagree on Shields. I’m not saying he isn’t a good player. He is a terrific pitcher . . . now. But he is also almost 32 years old. I’m just saying I would have rather had Myers play everyday this year than Shields pitch every fifth day. I don’t think anyone thinks that the trade was good for the Royals in the long term. My argument is that it wasn’t good for them in the short term either.

      So, Davis is a good relief pitcher, but not a good starter? Everyone who has ever pitched a game will tell you how hard it is to be a starter by pacing yourself and how easy it is to pitch relief where you give everything you have until you run out of gas. There is no comparison. Show me a decent fourth starter and I’ll show you a terrific relief pitcher. Luke Hochevar anyone?

  7. KHAZAD says:

    It was a very good season, destroyed by one awful month. Beginning in early May and ending in early June, the Royals went 6-22 and never won consecutive games. They are (currently) 74-49 in the remainder of the season. That is a playoff team.

    The bad month was typical old Royals, with Dayton Moore and Ned Yost’s earmarks all over it. In the majority of those games they hit Alcides Escobar or Chris Getz leadoff. Escobar hit 2nd in every game he didn’t lead off. They kept running Jeff Francouer out there, as Moore tried to keep the faith in the first draft pick he had major input on (with the Braves),despite overwhelming evidence that he was done. They let Mike Moustakas play through perhaps the worst slump ever instead of looking for a temporary solution (Not “giving up on him” but playing to win now)when he was so lost they might have gotten more production letting a pitcher hit in his spot. Though not in the spotlight he has been in recently, Yost made some unexplainable in game decisions during that stretch that made it worse

    This race was lost in May, and it actually makes me more angry to see how close the team has come to making the playoffs.

    As for next year, there are still questions about whether we will be as good or better than we were this year. The rotation is largely a question mark for next year. There is (still, forever, always)still a pretty big hole at second base and right field. (Lough is not an every day answer and Bonifacio is better as a utility guy) The bullpen has had an historically good year, one virtually impossible to match in 2014. They could have the best bullpen in the AL next year but still be worse than this year.

    I am enjoying watching the standings at this time of year, and it is fun winning more games than we lose for once, but it could have been more, and I am worried that it will be a one year blip.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *