By In Stuff

A Night Of Arizona Baseball

PHOENIX — Sometimes, it’s fun to pretend you’re watching a baseball game for the first time. I tried that again Monday night here in Phoenix. The Dodgers were playing the Diamondbacks. Gametime temperature was 101 degrees. But it was a dry heat. The Dodgers are on the brink of winning the National League West — their magic number is 4, meaning they need a combined four Dodgers wins and Diamonbacks losses to wrap this thing up.

Obviously the cleanest way for Los Angeles to get this done is to win two of the three games here in Arizona. There was a lot of talk before Monday night’s game on the Arizona side about preventing the Dodgers from celebrating on the Diamondbacks home turf. These are the little things you play for when your team’s season is almost done.

The game itself was quite entertaining. First batter of the game, Los Angeles’ Nick Punto, bounced a single to center field and then — for reasons that can only be clear in the mind of Nick Punto — slid headfirst into first base. Sliding headfirst into first base is Nick Punto’s calling card, and while, objectively, it is phenomenally stupid, I can’t help but think the game is better because of it.

Small, scrappy, gritty, gamer types like Nick Punto, Skip Schumaker, Willie Bloomquist (all who were playing in this game, by the way) tend to draw way too much praise from baseball people who should know better because, well, they are small, scrappy, gritty, gamer types. Everybody has seen the movie Rudy. That overpraise leads to extreme backlash from us snarky Internet types who can’t help but point out that it’s really hard to find the players’ actual value except in nebulous announcer talk about stuff that doesn’t appear in the box score and doing anything to help the ball club.

But Punto specifically really has gotten just about everything a baseball player can get out of his talent. He’s listed at 5-foot-9 and probably isn’t that. He’s listed at 195 and probably IS that. He can’t generate power, he’s not especially fast, he strikes out way more than a player of his ilk should. He’s the kind of guy you would see in the mall and NEVER suspect as a baseball player. He’s the kind of guy who plays a baseball player in unrealistic baseball movies. He has a .325 on-base percentage AND a .325 slugging percentage, neither good. His career .651 OPS is among the lowest for big league players with 3,500 plate appearances.

But you know what? He got those 3,500 plate appearances (3,493 to be exact) by literally playing every position except catcher (and, even by the numbers, playing them very well), by laying down bunts (more on this in a minute), by stealing some bases on sheer will, by putting his body constantly on the line (diving into first base demonstrates that point, but Punto will dive for anything) and by proving time and again a certain sturdiness that appeals to managers.

I’ve written about this before — baseball managers, many of them, would rather play a limited player who will not embarrass himself or the team over a more talented player who might do one or both. That’s why so many managers are reluctant to play the kids. Kids are young, and young players are inexperienced, and inexperienced players might do something astoundingly stupid like throw to the wrong base or overthrow a cutoff man or fail to get a bunt down or say something stupid in the papers or simply check out for a moment mentally. This drives managers absolutely insane. I suspect this is true in real life too — in law firms and banks and companies and so on: If you’re a manager, you might rather have predictable mediocrity over variable excellence and awfulness. Nick Punto will grit his way through. It’s all he has, and dammit, there’s something inspiring about it.

Even if he does dive into first base headfirst on a single to center.

There were other entertaining moments, such as Paul Goldschmidt’s two-run blast to center field. Later in the game, he made a nice play on a line drive. What a year this guy’s having. He leads the National League in homers, RBIs, OPS, total bases. You know, the Diamondbacks found him in the eighth round of the 2009 draft, right between guys named Cory Burns and Jon Garcia. If teams could find ONE GUY as good Paul Goldschmidt in every draft — anywhere from first round to last — they would be a great team year after year. It doesn’t seem like it should be that hard. But, of course, it is that hard.

I’m about to get to the whole point of this, but I must point out one more thing — after the fifth inning in Arizona, they have what’s called the “Diamondbacks Legends Race.” Yes, even the name has some fun irony to it. What they do is they get those big-headed mascot versions of four Diamondbacks “legends” and have them race around the field, not unlike the sausage race in Milwaukee. The Diamondbacks legends are: Randy Johnson (check), Matt Williams (um, OK, sort of, maybe, but not really for the Diamondbacks), Luis Gonzalez (OK, I guess, maybe for 2001) and Mark Grace (what?). No, I don’t know where Curt Schilling is. Look, the Diamondbacks have only been around for 15 or so years; you have to make do with what you have.

But here’s the best part: Mark Grace has NEVER WON THE RACE.

I love stuff like this. It’s like I love when they sneak in a subtle but excellent grown-up references into animated features. Now, with Grace there is some dark stuff going on here — he was let go by the team as announcer after his second DUI last year. But even beyond that, Mark Grace was no more a D-Backs legend than Mark Grudzielanek was a Royals legend. So this is simply a classic inside joke. Every night they trot out that Mark Grace mascot to race in the D-Backs legends race. Every night he loses. May it last forever.

And finally there’s the point of watching a game like its new. The Dodgers had a dreadful lineup Monday. Hanley Ramirez, Andre Ethier, Carl Crawford and Matt Kemp are all hurt or hurting, so the Dodgers lineup was basically Gonzalez and Puig and then take a kneeg. When Goldschmidt hit that two-run homer, it was clear that LA would need several minor miracles to get back those two runs.

Then came the ninth inning, LA down 2-1, and manager Don Mattingly sent Michael Young to the plate. This Dodgers team is one of those crazy teams that has so many familiar players, you constantly find yourself going, “Oh yeah, I FORGOT they had Michael Young,” or “Wow, Brian Wilson is on that this team too.” Young did what Michael Young has been doing since the dawn of time — he hit a line drive single up the middle. Then Skip Schumaker — bless the gritty ones — singled to left. First and second, nobody out.

OK, let’s look at a couple of numbers. At this point — with runners on first and second, nobody out — the Dodgers would be expected to score 1.42 runs in the inning. That’s the league average in 2013. That means the expectation is somewhere between one and two runs. Perhaps more telling — since the Dodgers needed just one run to tie the game — they had roughly a 64% of scoring a run, based on historical data.

So, if you’re watching a game for the first time, and you have a general understanding of the rules, you’re pretty excited here. The Dodgers clearly have an excellent chance to score the tying run and a reasonable chance of taking the lead. Up comes Juan Uribe, who has been playing baseball since the Mesozoic Age and who might be the best hitter in this particular lineup after Gonzalez and Puig. Admittedly, that’s not saying much, but he’s hitting .272 this year with 30 extra base hits, and he’s a veteran guy who played in more than 1,500 big league baseball games and two World Series.

So you look on the field and you see that Uribe, rather than take the usual batting stance, is turned toward the pitcher, and he has is holding the bat with his left hand on the handle and his right hand way up near the barrel. You see the Diamondbacks players — especially first baseman Paul Goldschmidt — running TOWARD Uribe, as if they have something very important to tell him. The pitch comes, and Uribe attempts to dink the ball in front of him, but it rolls foul.

I think this would be the point where you would turn to the person next to you and ask in your native language: “What the %#$#$@%#$ is going on here?’

The sacrifice bunt, to be fair, would not be THAT hard to explain. As a baseball expert, you would say that Uribe is simply giving himself up in an effort to move the runners to second and third. “Does this increase the run scoring potential?” the first-timer would ask. And, if you were honest, you would say: “Well, not exactly by the numbers.”

Run expectancy with runners on first and second and nobody out: 1.42

Run expectancy with runners on second and third and one out: 1.29

OK, our first timer will say, “Yes, but does this increase the chance of scoring ONE run? “And here you could honestly answer, “Yes, it does a little bit.” The percentage chance of scoring one run with runners on first and second and nobody out, as mentioned, is about 64%. the chances of scoring one run with runners on second and third and one out is about 70%. So, OK, it’s clear the Dodgers are looking for a tiny advantage here and are playing for one run to tie the game.

Um, OK, that’s the GENERAL percentage. But there are a couple of problems with this particular case.

One is that Juan Uribe, while not exactly Mickey Mantle, is a markedly better hitter than the guy coming up, a 26-year-old career minor leaguer named Nick Buss who is up in the big leagues for the first time and has managed two big league hits in his first three games as a substitute for the injured Carl Crawford.

Two is that Juan Uribe is not a good bunter — has not been since his younger days — and the Diamondbacks KNOW he will bunt, and so it’s hardly a sure thing that he can even GET the runners over to second and third by giving himself up.

This gets to the heart the morality of baseball. It SEEMS like an unselfish act, like sacrificing your own hitting opportunity for the betterment of the team, should greatly benefit a team. So shines a good deed in a weary world. Bunting the runners over would all but guarantee no double play, and if successful, would put two runners a good single away from scoring. That should be a noble and beneficial act.

But, alas, it is also purposely squandering one of the most precious things that a team is given when the game begins — one of the 27 outs that you are granted to score runs. In football it is time. In basketball, it is possessions. In baseball it is outs. I could not help but feel that Don Mattingly — and, to be fair, just about every other manager — cannot see the game through fresh eyes, cannot see it the way a curious child might see it.

“Why are you just giving away one of your final three outs?”

“That’s just the way we play the game here, son.”

Of course, Uribe laid down a terrible bunt, and Arizona pitcher Brad Ziegler picked up the ball and threw out the lead runner … so now the Dodgers had runners on first and second with one out instead of nobody out.

Run expectancies:

1st and 2nd, 0 out: 1.42.

1st and 2nd, 1 out: 0.88

Percentage chance of scoring one run:

1st and 2nd, 0 out: 64%.

1st and 2nd, 1 out: 43%

And, alas, the game was lost. Nick Buss dribbled a ground ball to first base. Then Mattingly sent up Matt Kemp, just activated, for his first at-bat in about two months. Kemp struck out on a Ziegler pitch that, on first observation, seemed to be roughly 11 feet outside. On replay, it was clearly no more than two feet outside. The Dodgers magic number stayed at four. Nick Punto’s jersey was dirty. And Bighead Mark Grace lost again. A full night of baseball.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

32 Responses to A Night Of Arizona Baseball

  1. Excellent post as always. Do your thoughts on bunting extend to bunting to get a hit–teams are batting .393 this year when bunting.

    • tomemos says:

      It’s a good point in general, but of course Uribe is roughly as likely to beat out a bunt base hit as he is to run a punt back for a touchdown.

    • Rob Smith says:

      It depends. If you’re a good bunter and fast, at minimum bunting periodically forces the defense to play tight and opens up the field. Similarly, if teams put a shift on, and all you need to do is bunt the ball somewhere between short and third, it would be wise…. Though it is rarely done, and should be done more often to defeat the shift. I saw Brian McCann finally put down a hard bunt just to the left of short. it was an easy hit. ive never seen him do it again and teams still shift for him. Or, like Steve Garvey, who was a good bunter and would bunt whenever the third baseman played behind the bag it’s a good call. But often the issue is that the person bunting or the person who should bunt for a hit just can’t do it. the vast majority of players are not good bunters.

    • drunyon says:

      I don’t know exactly how it’s calculated, so I could be wrong, but is it possible that .393 stat (now actually .396) is a bit rigged? By that I mean: if a fast guy is trying to sac bunt, and manages to beat it out for a hit, it counts positively towards his batting average. But if he tries to sac bunt and gets thrown out at first, it doesn’t affect his average at all. So wouldn’t that stat be artificially rigged upwards?

  2. Jim Haas says:

    When LNP (Little Nicky Punto) played for the Twins, he wore a cape (at least in the excellent characterization by the inimitable BatGirl). The Twins sort of miss LNP. But then, they sort of miss lots of former players.

  3. Ian says:

    Punto’s managed around 15 WAR in his career and made a little over 17m. Not a bad life at all.

  4. clashfan says:

    “the Dodgers lineup was basically Gonzalez and Puig and then take a kneeg.”

    Literally laughed out loud. Thanks, Joe.

  5. Wilbur says:

    If the batter doesn’t bunt, the manager is afraid he’ll get criticized for not going By The Book, especially if the batter hits into a double play.

    It’s just that simple.

  6. Rob Smith says:

    Bunting makes a lot more sense when the player asked to bunt is both a poor hitter and a good bunter. Also, the next hitter should be a better hitter. Nobody would complain if Mario Mendoza was asked to bunt prior to having Willie Stargell come up and pinch hit for the pitcher, it makes all the sense in the world. The scenario Joe laid out, meets none of these criteria and makes no sense at all. Mattingly is just not a good game manager, and he’s had some well publicized gaffes to prove it.

  7. Mark says:

    Good point Rob. Earl Weaver said almost the exact thing when he did a chapter on managing in a book on baseball I read many years ago. This has been forgotten today, but in Game 7 of the 1971 World Series the Orioles batted in the bottom of the 8th down two runs. They got their first two runners on and with the pitcher coming up, Earl put in a pinch hitter named Tom Shopay. And he bunted! Earl Weaver, bunting in a critical late inning situation in a World Series game. Earl Weaver.

    By the way, the bunt worked, runners moved up, but the O’s only got one run out of it and lost the game. But still.

  8. Alejo says:

    Remember “Ratatouille”? this Pixar film about a sewer rat who doubles as chef. Yeah, the plot is corny but it is the final monologue that brings sense to the whole thing. I was remembered of Ratatouille by this sentence: “… Don Mattingly …cannot see the game through fresh eyes, cannot see it the way a curious child might see it.”

  9. Trent Phloog says:

    Wow, if any team could find ONE GUY as good Paul Goldschmidt in every draft, it would have an MVP candidate at every position! It would be more than a great team; it would be THE GREATEST TEAM EVER.

  10. Ross Holden says:

    What’s the success rate of a squeeze play? I ask b/c in this case IF you really just wanted that one run, you could bunt twice in a row. If the success rate on a squeeze is higher than 70%, then you could make it more advantageous to bunt. Again, this only works if you have 2 good bunters.

  11. AdamE says:

    On the Grace Legend…

    When you are a team as young as the Diamondbacks you don’t really have any legends. Do the Mariners or Rockies have any legends either? So they put Grace in as a Legend because he played for the team and was very visable in his anouncing position. You missed this because he is no longer in the booth butwhen he was in the booth every night his mascot would loose and every night he would hold up a dry erase board with some message to the fans. Sometimes it was an excuse, sometimes a plee but it was extra interaction with the fans every single home game.

    I was suprised they didn’t get rid of the Grace mascot after the DUIs. I’m glad they didn’t makes them seem less “corporate”.

    • Ian R. says:

      The Mariners, last I checked, have Griffey, Ichiro, A-Rod (somewhat), Randy Johnson (somewhat) and Edgar Martinez. King Felix, of course, is building his legend as we speak.

      The Rockies have Larry Walker, Todd Helton and… point. Troy Tulowitzki is probably the next one up. Carlos Gonzalez, maybe, will be “legend”-worthy by the time his career is up.

      As for Arizona, they of course have a true legend in Randy Johnson. Curt Schilling was pretty dominant, too, and certainly more deserving than Mark Grace or Matt Williams. Those guys were veterans who played out the tail ends of their careers with Arizona; Schilling was a dominant co-Ace who teamed with Johnson to give the team the most feared 1-2 punch in the league.

    • Edgar Martinez, Ken Griffey Jr, Ichiro Suzuki, Randy Johnson. A-Rod?

  12. MLJ says:

    One (very small) quibble: I find football easier to think of when I imagine its fundamental component to be first downs rather than time per se. That also makes football unique in that its fundamental essence is renewable — like the genie who CAN give you three more wishes, if you use your first three wisely.

  13. Herb Smith says:

    Serious question: When Randy Johnson goes into the Hall Of Fame on the first ballot in a couple years, who’s hat will he wear? In a 22-year career, he only spent 6 of those in Arizona.

    In my mind, he’s a Seattle man; that’s where his legend first flowered, and he just seems associated with that scrappy, entertaining Jay Buhner-Junior Griffey-young, likable A-Rod-Lou Piniella team.

    Yet, it’s no joke for the Diamondbacks to consider him their “legend.” In his 6 years there, he was the best pitcher in the NL 5 times! He won 4 consecutive Cy Youngs (he came in 2nd in the 2004 vote). And he led the D-Backs to a world championship, going 3-0 in the Series, and being named co-MVP. I’m sure there are fans out there who think of the Unit-Schilling combo as every bit as effective/famous as Koufax/Drysdale, or Spahn and Sain.

    Should be interesting.

  14. Herb Smith says:

    FWIW, I think he SHOULD go in as a D-Back.

  15. Herb Smith says:

    FWIW, I think he SHOULD go in as a D-Back.

  16. I decided to post just to say THANK GOODNESS!! Dodger fans weren’t the only ones who noticed this!!! This is the 2nd article I’ve seen posted about the subject in the past day. That was just really horrible, but probably par for the course as far as managers go.

    The media was going on about Puig costing us a game in the playoffs, when it might actually Donnie 2Times who does.

    And Mark Grace was horrible!! I’m glad they got rid of that clown.

  17. Dinky says:

    I completely agree with your comments about the bunt. And I’m thoroughly unhappy with Punto’s head first slides into first base. The laws of physics say that it will take you slightly longer to reach first base on a head first dive than by running through the base, because once you start diving your legs are no longer accelerating you. So unless you weigh 400 pounds or so, it’s faster to keep on running. This weekend, Punto dove twice. The first dive he was barely out; would he have been safe if he kept running? We’ll never know. The second one, he was safe, but a bad throw bounced off diving Punto stopping the ball from going into the dugout and allowing the tying run to score from third. The *ONLY* time diving into first is smart is if you see a high bad throw, know the first baseman will have to leave the bag to snag it, and he will try a sweep tag. Then and only then does diving under him make sense. And if the ball gets away from the first baseman, you’re on the ground instead of ready to take the extra base. Just an all around stupid showy play. Punto is a pretty fair utility player but he should run through the bag like everybody is coached.

  18. Wilbur says:

    I heard or read a player (Steve Lyons?) say that although he knew it was faster to run through the base, he thought for some reason an umpire was more likely to call you safe if you slid into first on a very close play.

    Of course you should keep your pants on if he calls you safe.

  19. ghulam abid says:

    Every thing will be Free, Facebook Likes, Twitter Followers, Twitter Tweets, Twitter Re-Tweets, Twitter Favorites, Google Plus Followers, StumbleUpon Followers, Youtube Views, Youtube Likes, Youtube Subsribes, Pinterest Followers, Pinterest Likes, Pinterest PinIt, Free Website Visitors.
    Just Join now and Free Increase your Social Media Networks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *