<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yuni Watch: 7/29</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/</link>
	<description>Curiously Long Posts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Bee</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-68320</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-68320</guid>
		<description>What does Willie Bloomquist need to do to get some props here?  He was hitting .278 as of this week--better than all position players in the Mariners&#039; lineup except Ichiro and Guttierez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does Willie Bloomquist need to do to get some props here?  He was hitting .278 as of this week&#8211;better than all position players in the Mariners&#8217; lineup except Ichiro and Guttierez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in NYC</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-68282</link>
		<dc:creator>David in NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-68282</guid>
		<description>@AxDxMx #32 --

Actually, the cutoff for &quot;small sample size&quot; is, in statistical theory, 30.

That is, assuming independent and random events, 30 observations is enough to make a statistically meaningful statement.  Obviously, of course, that number may vary depending on the &quot;normal&quot; (i.e., standard) deviation one wishes to accept.

And do you really think another 200 ABs is going to help his case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AxDxMx #32 &#8211;</p>
<p>Actually, the cutoff for &#8220;small sample size&#8221; is, in statistical theory, 30.</p>
<p>That is, assuming independent and random events, 30 observations is enough to make a statistically meaningful statement.  Obviously, of course, that number may vary depending on the &#8220;normal&#8221; (i.e., standard) deviation one wishes to accept.</p>
<p>And do you really think another 200 ABs is going to help his case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-68013</link>
		<dc:creator>KT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-68013</guid>
		<description>I suppose adjusting for park effects would not really help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose adjusting for park effects would not really help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pepe</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67948</link>
		<dc:creator>pepe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67948</guid>
		<description>This post was neither curious or long. Just sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was neither curious or long. Just sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bellylard</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67942</link>
		<dc:creator>Bellylard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67942</guid>
		<description>The Mariners are trying to see what happens when you ONLY have fielding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mariners are trying to see what happens when you ONLY have fielding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67931</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67931</guid>
		<description>The problem with the cake expression is not its meaning but the fact that people misuse it as an analogy.  It&#039;s most commonly applied in a situation where two things are mutually exclusive.  

&quot;I want Yuni to be the Royals&#039; everyday shortstop, and I want them to win the division.&quot;
&quot;Sorry, but you can&#039;t have your cake and eat it too.&quot;

&quot;I can&#039;t decide whether to buy the Ferrari or the Mercedes.  I wish I could buy both, but I can&#039;t afford that.&quot;
&quot;Sorry, but you can&#039;t have your cake and eat it too.&quot;

The expression simply doesn&#039;t apply in these cases.  With the cake expression it&#039;s the same thing you can&#039;t both eat and have.  Applying it to a situation in which two different things cannot obtain is where the confusion comes in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the cake expression is not its meaning but the fact that people misuse it as an analogy.  It&#8217;s most commonly applied in a situation where two things are mutually exclusive.  </p>
<p>&#8220;I want Yuni to be the Royals&#8217; everyday shortstop, and I want them to win the division.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Sorry, but you can&#8217;t have your cake and eat it too.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I can&#8217;t decide whether to buy the Ferrari or the Mercedes.  I wish I could buy both, but I can&#8217;t afford that.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Sorry, but you can&#8217;t have your cake and eat it too.&#8221;</p>
<p>The expression simply doesn&#8217;t apply in these cases.  With the cake expression it&#8217;s the same thing you can&#8217;t both eat and have.  Applying it to a situation in which two different things cannot obtain is where the confusion comes in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nightfly</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67872</link>
		<dc:creator>nightfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67872</guid>
		<description>The sad thing about arguing about small sample size re: Yuni... in KC, he may actually GET 200 more PA for a reasonable sample size.  I think most Royals fans would preferf the alternative: wondering how bad he could have been for three months solid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad thing about arguing about small sample size re: Yuni&#8230; in KC, he may actually GET 200 more PA for a reasonable sample size.  I think most Royals fans would preferf the alternative: wondering how bad he could have been for three months solid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe R</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67871</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67871</guid>
		<description>You forgot this part Joe:

Betancourt in KC:
FRAA: -1
UZR: -1.8

Pretty awesome stuff through 109 innings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot this part Joe:</p>
<p>Betancourt in KC:<br />
FRAA: -1<br />
UZR: -1.8</p>
<p>Pretty awesome stuff through 109 innings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somebody</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67866</link>
		<dc:creator>somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67866</guid>
		<description>per the phillies having their cake and eating it....

It looked for awhile like the Dodgers might get Lee, so if i were given the option that the Phillies get Halladay and the Dodgers get Lee, or the Phillies get Lee and nobody gets Halladay, i would be quite pleased with the Phillies getting Lee. they saved some money and though I like the catcher in the deal(in that i dont like their major league catcher), but I am excited that they keep drabek and their other big time prospects.

traditionally in Philly, this is when you take a step back and go &quot;man, how can this go wrong?&quot; Oh how things change after a World Series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>per the phillies having their cake and eating it&#8230;.</p>
<p>It looked for awhile like the Dodgers might get Lee, so if i were given the option that the Phillies get Halladay and the Dodgers get Lee, or the Phillies get Lee and nobody gets Halladay, i would be quite pleased with the Phillies getting Lee. they saved some money and though I like the catcher in the deal(in that i dont like their major league catcher), but I am excited that they keep drabek and their other big time prospects.</p>
<p>traditionally in Philly, this is when you take a step back and go &#8220;man, how can this go wrong?&#8221; Oh how things change after a World Series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67862</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/29/yuni-watch-729/#comment-67862</guid>
		<description>The funny thing about that exchange in When Harry Met Sally is that he&#039;s questioning a lyric that is itself a question. 

&quot;Should old acquaintance be forgot and never brought to mind?&quot;

Should we hang on to the past or should we leave it behind? It&#039;s kind of a deep question at the start of a new year and it&#039;s funny to me that it&#039;s become possibly the most popular party song in the English language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing about that exchange in When Harry Met Sally is that he&#8217;s questioning a lyric that is itself a question. </p>
<p>&#8220;Should old acquaintance be forgot and never brought to mind?&#8221;</p>
<p>Should we hang on to the past or should we leave it behind? It&#8217;s kind of a deep question at the start of a new year and it&#8217;s funny to me that it&#8217;s become possibly the most popular party song in the English language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->