<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Math Exercise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/</link>
	<description>A Rough Draft Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:12:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66608</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66608</guid>
		<description>@ spud - The opposite of Pac-Man?

How about Adam &quot;Blinky&quot; Jones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ spud &#8211; The opposite of Pac-Man?</p>
<p>How about Adam &#8220;Blinky&#8221; Jones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I was going to get a blog out before I went on vacation&#8230; &#124; Capitol Avenue Club</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66315</link>
		<dc:creator>I was going to get a blog out before I went on vacation&#8230; &#124; Capitol Avenue Club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66315</guid>
		<description>[...] 6) I&#8217;ve already forgotten which number I&#8217;m on and am having to look them up.  Let&#8217;s stay with Joe Poz.  On an event at the ASG. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6) I&#8217;ve already forgotten which number I&#8217;m on and am having to look them up.  Let&#8217;s stay with Joe Poz.  On an event at the ASG. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66292</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66292</guid>
		<description>Amen, Brother.

But as long as this exhibition game &#039;counts&#039; it&#039;s gonna happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, Brother.</p>
<p>But as long as this exhibition game &#8216;counts&#8217; it&#8217;s gonna happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark W</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66244</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66244</guid>
		<description>Judy #70: Very well thought out scenario that we did NOT need to witness.

Bryz #69: MLB claims that they can not wait until possibly only a few days before Game 1 of WS to know where that game is to be played. By MLB knowing now that the AL will once again host Games 1&amp;2 and the NL will host 3&amp;4 (and possibly 5) so many of the headaches of hotel rooms, stadium availability, party accomodations etc are whittled down to only 2 cities per league by the start of the LCS of each league. 

One could argue that it makes little difference but MLB has been doing this for a very long time and they know that limiting the possibilities of cities, dates, etc is the best way for them to proceed. Consider the scenario where a 95 win Tampa team wins the ALCS on Tues eve and a a 96 win Philly team is playing a 93 win Dodger team in their Game 7of NLCS on Wed eve. We do not know if Tampa is hosting Games 1&amp;2 of WS (Sat &amp; Sun) or Games 3-4 until after the NLCS series is decided. It really becomes a mess in last minute arrangements. It is rough enough as it is but knowing what league is hosting Games 1&amp;2 prior to the playoffs helps considerably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy #70: Very well thought out scenario that we did NOT need to witness.</p>
<p>Bryz #69: MLB claims that they can not wait until possibly only a few days before Game 1 of WS to know where that game is to be played. By MLB knowing now that the AL will once again host Games 1&amp;2 and the NL will host 3&amp;4 (and possibly 5) so many of the headaches of hotel rooms, stadium availability, party accomodations etc are whittled down to only 2 cities per league by the start of the LCS of each league. </p>
<p>One could argue that it makes little difference but MLB has been doing this for a very long time and they know that limiting the possibilities of cities, dates, etc is the best way for them to proceed. Consider the scenario where a 95 win Tampa team wins the ALCS on Tues eve and a a 96 win Philly team is playing a 93 win Dodger team in their Game 7of NLCS on Wed eve. We do not know if Tampa is hosting Games 1&amp;2 of WS (Sat &amp; Sun) or Games 3-4 until after the NLCS series is decided. It really becomes a mess in last minute arrangements. It is rough enough as it is but knowing what league is hosting Games 1&amp;2 prior to the playoffs helps considerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66235</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66235</guid>
		<description>As bad as I feel for Indians fans for not getting to see their only All Star bat, it could have been much worse if that run hadn&#039;t scored, and if the game had remained tied well into extra innings, and their only All Star would have been forced into the potentially very humiliating experience of trying to catch Tim Wakefield for the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As bad as I feel for Indians fans for not getting to see their only All Star bat, it could have been much worse if that run hadn&#8217;t scored, and if the game had remained tied well into extra innings, and their only All Star would have been forced into the potentially very humiliating experience of trying to catch Tim Wakefield for the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryz</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66221</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66221</guid>
		<description>I would have liked the comet tail better during the HR Derby if it didn&#039;t look like it was having a midair seizure every single time. Oh, and I would have liked the Derby in general better if Berman wasn&#039;t announcing. BACK BACK BACK BACK BACK!

Let each team&#039;s regular season record determine home field advantage. Sure, there may be a team that wins it even though they beat up on weak teams, but as someone above mentioned, a 93 win AL team is probably better than a 95 win NL team. Unfortunately if they both have the same number of wins, then we&#039;d be dealing with some tiebreakers. At least a coin flip wouldn&#039;t be used...

Unless the overall interleague record is being used, I don&#039;t think an individual team&#039;s interleague record should decide HFA. Using only 18 games is too small of a sample size to decide the biggest games of the year, especially when those 18 come against a single division and that team&#039;s &quot;natural rival.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have liked the comet tail better during the HR Derby if it didn&#8217;t look like it was having a midair seizure every single time. Oh, and I would have liked the Derby in general better if Berman wasn&#8217;t announcing. BACK BACK BACK BACK BACK!</p>
<p>Let each team&#8217;s regular season record determine home field advantage. Sure, there may be a team that wins it even though they beat up on weak teams, but as someone above mentioned, a 93 win AL team is probably better than a 95 win NL team. Unfortunately if they both have the same number of wins, then we&#8217;d be dealing with some tiebreakers. At least a coin flip wouldn&#8217;t be used&#8230;</p>
<p>Unless the overall interleague record is being used, I don&#8217;t think an individual team&#8217;s interleague record should decide HFA. Using only 18 games is too small of a sample size to decide the biggest games of the year, especially when those 18 come against a single division and that team&#8217;s &#8220;natural rival.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grammarian@mindspring.com</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66172</link>
		<dc:creator>Grammarian@mindspring.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66172</guid>
		<description>AIWALG = 107[4?AIW + 3DN + 3F~D]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIWALG = 107[4?AIW + 3DN + 3F~D]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66170</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66170</guid>
		<description>If the game is that important, follow the example from the 1970&#039;s - I forget who did this - I feel like it was Martin, or Weaver, or maybe the Oakland A&#039;s.  They had a group of good glove second basemen.  Start one, when he came up, pinch hit with your power guy on the bench, unless you need to sacrifice.  Insert next defense-minded second baseman.  Lather, rinse, repeat.

If the game really matters, Teixiera should have gotten 4 ABs for the AL.  You could have let Aaron Hill (for example - he was the 8th hitter, so you assume he&#039;s the worst hitting starter - but still an awesome player) get one AB, then pinch hit one of your guys on the bench that you don&#039;t really want to have - say Andruw Jones.  Insert Zobrist to play second.  Get him one AB.  Pinch hit someone else (say, Brandon Inge).  Leave Inge in and move Michael Young to second.  You&#039;ve gotten four guys in the game without having to pull Teixiera or Young to do it.  Notice you also save your big guns to pinch hit in the right spots, etc, and if the game goes in to extra innings, your number 4 hitter is still Teixiera.  It&#039;s not like I am being brilliant here - someone did this, and these guys could learn from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the game is that important, follow the example from the 1970&#8217;s &#8211; I forget who did this &#8211; I feel like it was Martin, or Weaver, or maybe the Oakland A&#8217;s.  They had a group of good glove second basemen.  Start one, when he came up, pinch hit with your power guy on the bench, unless you need to sacrifice.  Insert next defense-minded second baseman.  Lather, rinse, repeat.</p>
<p>If the game really matters, Teixiera should have gotten 4 ABs for the AL.  You could have let Aaron Hill (for example &#8211; he was the 8th hitter, so you assume he&#8217;s the worst hitting starter &#8211; but still an awesome player) get one AB, then pinch hit one of your guys on the bench that you don&#8217;t really want to have &#8211; say Andruw Jones.  Insert Zobrist to play second.  Get him one AB.  Pinch hit someone else (say, Brandon Inge).  Leave Inge in and move Michael Young to second.  You&#8217;ve gotten four guys in the game without having to pull Teixiera or Young to do it.  Notice you also save your big guns to pinch hit in the right spots, etc, and if the game goes in to extra innings, your number 4 hitter is still Teixiera.  It&#8217;s not like I am being brilliant here &#8211; someone did this, and these guys could learn from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surfer</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66132</link>
		<dc:creator>surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66132</guid>
		<description>Someone mentioned the HR derby.  I wanted to watch but just couldnt when I remembered that Chris Berman would be doing play by play, if you can call it that.  I freaking hate Chris Berman.  If he was never seen on TV again it would be too soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone mentioned the HR derby.  I wanted to watch but just couldnt when I remembered that Chris Berman would be doing play by play, if you can call it that.  I freaking hate Chris Berman.  If he was never seen on TV again it would be too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66126</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2009/07/14/a-math-exercise/#comment-66126</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one night and it is a part of baseball&#039;s tradition.

I&#039;m for anything that prompts discussion about baseball history and honors the greats of the game - however flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one night and it is a part of baseball&#8217;s tradition.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m for anything that prompts discussion about baseball history and honors the greats of the game &#8211; however flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->