<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Parker Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/</link>
	<description>Curiously Long Posts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:31:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#124; Tits and Baseball</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/#comment-46679</link>
		<dc:creator>&#124; Tits and Baseball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/22/the-parker-question/#comment-46679</guid>
		<description>[...] the best policy.Official Mainstream Newspaper Columnist of AG.com Joe Posnanski recently posted an interesting blog entry about the questions asked by reporters and included this amusing aside:Of course cheering in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the best policy.Official Mainstream Newspaper Columnist of AG.com Joe Posnanski recently posted an interesting blog entry about the questions asked by reporters and included this amusing aside:Of course cheering in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/#comment-46195</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/22/the-parker-question/#comment-46195</guid>
		<description>no cheering in the press?

someone forgot to give that memo to the mainstream media in regards to obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no cheering in the press?</p>
<p>someone forgot to give that memo to the mainstream media in regards to obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Aronson</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/#comment-46073</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Aronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/22/the-parker-question/#comment-46073</guid>
		<description>JJ, Parker wrote: &quot;My attempt (at humor) failed.

And because of that, my attempt at humor may have seemed slighted, cruel, and even insensitive.

For that, I apologize. &quot;

It seems clear to me.  Parker thought he was asking a funny question.  He never considered what would happen if some folks didn&#039;t get the joke.  Once he considered how easy it was not to get the joke, he realized his attempt at humor may have seemed slighted etc., and apologized.

Lots of comedians have written jokes they thought were funny, only to see them bomb and then engender controversy.  I think this is one of those cases.  I see nothing wrong with Parker&#039;s apology.  I see plenty wrong with Marinelli&#039;s nepotism.  I mean, give that these are the Detroit Lions here, it was foreseeable that they would not be a good team even if the coaches were good.  And there&#039;s no way to objectively rate quality coaching without quality results: victories on the field.  So I think Marinelli *should* have seen the probability that at some point this year, he might be put in the terrible position of appearing not to fire his son-in-law because of his daughter, or the terrible position of having to fire his son-in-law to protect his own job.

So IMO Marinelli, as soon as it became clear that a wedding was in the offing, should have told the son-in-law to find another job ASAP, given him a letter of recommendation, and sent him packing.  It would have protected both of them.  Yes, maybe the son-in-law is the best defensive coach in football, and Marinelli was right to want to keep him.  But given that front office, what are the chances that even the best coach in football might be hamstrung by the players he had to work with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ, Parker wrote: &#8220;My attempt (at humor) failed.</p>
<p>And because of that, my attempt at humor may have seemed slighted, cruel, and even insensitive.</p>
<p>For that, I apologize. &#8221;</p>
<p>It seems clear to me.  Parker thought he was asking a funny question.  He never considered what would happen if some folks didn&#8217;t get the joke.  Once he considered how easy it was not to get the joke, he realized his attempt at humor may have seemed slighted etc., and apologized.</p>
<p>Lots of comedians have written jokes they thought were funny, only to see them bomb and then engender controversy.  I think this is one of those cases.  I see nothing wrong with Parker&#8217;s apology.  I see plenty wrong with Marinelli&#8217;s nepotism.  I mean, give that these are the Detroit Lions here, it was foreseeable that they would not be a good team even if the coaches were good.  And there&#8217;s no way to objectively rate quality coaching without quality results: victories on the field.  So I think Marinelli *should* have seen the probability that at some point this year, he might be put in the terrible position of appearing not to fire his son-in-law because of his daughter, or the terrible position of having to fire his son-in-law to protect his own job.</p>
<p>So IMO Marinelli, as soon as it became clear that a wedding was in the offing, should have told the son-in-law to find another job ASAP, given him a letter of recommendation, and sent him packing.  It would have protected both of them.  Yes, maybe the son-in-law is the best defensive coach in football, and Marinelli was right to want to keep him.  But given that front office, what are the chances that even the best coach in football might be hamstrung by the players he had to work with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hitandrun</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/#comment-46027</link>
		<dc:creator>Hitandrun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/22/the-parker-question/#comment-46027</guid>
		<description>I remember back in the 70&#039;s when ASU was having a miserable season and a reporter asked Frank Kush after a particularly rough loss: &quot;Coach, what do you think of your team&#039;s execution?&quot;  Kush replied &quot;I&#039;m in favor of it.&quot;  Maybe if Marinelli had played it a little lighter there would be no controversy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember back in the 70&#8217;s when ASU was having a miserable season and a reporter asked Frank Kush after a particularly rough loss: &#8220;Coach, what do you think of your team&#8217;s execution?&#8221;  Kush replied &#8220;I&#8217;m in favor of it.&#8221;  Maybe if Marinelli had played it a little lighter there would be no controversy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkIDX</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/#comment-46025</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkIDX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/22/the-parker-question/#comment-46025</guid>
		<description>I changed my handle from Mark to MarkW to MarkIDX because we seem to be proliferating.

&quot;Over the course of oneâ€™s sports writer/broadcaster/reporter career, youâ€™re bound to say something stupid or offensive at some point. You ask 5000 questions over the years and one is in bad tasteâ€¦ itâ€™s gonna happen. &quot;

-- absolutely true, and one reason my teaching career had its ups and downs...

However, there&#039;s no way in the world he just pulled that line out of the air.  He had that one in the holster ready to go, so while I can allow some slack for a Crime of Passion, this was clearly Premeditated Sniping.

Unfortunately I&#039;m not sure the Geneva Convention permits a punishment more severe than watching the Lions year after year, so I&#039;m guessing he&#039;ll get off with time served.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I changed my handle from Mark to MarkW to MarkIDX because we seem to be proliferating.</p>
<p>&#8220;Over the course of oneâ€™s sports writer/broadcaster/reporter career, youâ€™re bound to say something stupid or offensive at some point. You ask 5000 questions over the years and one is in bad tasteâ€¦ itâ€™s gonna happen. &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; absolutely true, and one reason my teaching career had its ups and downs&#8230;</p>
<p>However, there&#8217;s no way in the world he just pulled that line out of the air.  He had that one in the holster ready to go, so while I can allow some slack for a Crime of Passion, this was clearly Premeditated Sniping.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I&#8217;m not sure the Geneva Convention permits a punishment more severe than watching the Lions year after year, so I&#8217;m guessing he&#8217;ll get off with time served.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPC</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/#comment-45798</link>
		<dc:creator>MPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 08:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/22/the-parker-question/#comment-45798</guid>
		<description>Funny that you mentioned passer rating. It&#039;s quoted so often by fans and commentators, yet I guarantee NONE of them could tell you the formula offf the top of their heads. Yet these same people refuse to embrace advanced metrics in baseball, calling them &quot;nerdy.&quot; I just don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that you mentioned passer rating. It&#8217;s quoted so often by fans and commentators, yet I guarantee NONE of them could tell you the formula offf the top of their heads. Yet these same people refuse to embrace advanced metrics in baseball, calling them &#8220;nerdy.&#8221; I just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin S.</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/#comment-45777</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/22/the-parker-question/#comment-45777</guid>
		<description>Joe,

Love your work, but I think your introduction to this column mischaracterized the Parker-Marinelli exchange leading up to his final question.  As another poster noted, Parker had been pestering Marinelli the whole session with questions about the coordinator; when he didn&#039;t get the reaction/answer he wanted, he went for the jugular and crossed the line.

Beyond that, it&#039;s important to note exactly which question was asked -- if he simply said &quot;if he wasn&#039;t you son-in-law would he still have a job&quot;, to me that&#039;s a legitimate and fair (if pointed) question.  But to phrase it the way he did was nothing more than a cheap shot intended to pique Marinelli into exploding on national TV.

He deserves whatever criticism he gets, and then some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>Love your work, but I think your introduction to this column mischaracterized the Parker-Marinelli exchange leading up to his final question.  As another poster noted, Parker had been pestering Marinelli the whole session with questions about the coordinator; when he didn&#8217;t get the reaction/answer he wanted, he went for the jugular and crossed the line.</p>
<p>Beyond that, it&#8217;s important to note exactly which question was asked &#8212; if he simply said &#8220;if he wasn&#8217;t you son-in-law would he still have a job&#8221;, to me that&#8217;s a legitimate and fair (if pointed) question.  But to phrase it the way he did was nothing more than a cheap shot intended to pique Marinelli into exploding on national TV.</p>
<p>He deserves whatever criticism he gets, and then some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: map</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/#comment-45754</link>
		<dc:creator>map</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/22/the-parker-question/#comment-45754</guid>
		<description>The other thing about this is that the Lions are completely non-responsive to the media and their fans. Matt Millen was fired and there was no press conference and we have heard nothing at all from him. Previous to that he had spoken once in two years and told us how great the team was practicing. William Clay Ford Sr. (Fredo or George W. Bush, whichever idiot son you wish to compare him to) rarely speaks, and when he does says something stupid like he&#039;s going to keep the front-office intact after an 0-16 season. Marinelli&#039;s press conferences are sureal and have spawned several drinking games. I think you have to think about the Parker episode in that context and realize that fans here in Detroit don&#039;t care as much about bruising Marinelli&#039;s feelings as the FOX NFL crew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other thing about this is that the Lions are completely non-responsive to the media and their fans. Matt Millen was fired and there was no press conference and we have heard nothing at all from him. Previous to that he had spoken once in two years and told us how great the team was practicing. William Clay Ford Sr. (Fredo or George W. Bush, whichever idiot son you wish to compare him to) rarely speaks, and when he does says something stupid like he&#8217;s going to keep the front-office intact after an 0-16 season. Marinelli&#8217;s press conferences are sureal and have spawned several drinking games. I think you have to think about the Parker episode in that context and realize that fans here in Detroit don&#8217;t care as much about bruising Marinelli&#8217;s feelings as the FOX NFL crew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/#comment-45740</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/22/the-parker-question/#comment-45740</guid>
		<description>Any/all embarrassing questions from Detroit sportswriters should be required to include the name &#039;Matt Millen&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any/all embarrassing questions from Detroit sportswriters should be required to include the name &#8216;Matt Millen&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark W.</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/23/the-parker-question/#comment-45737</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/22/the-parker-question/#comment-45737</guid>
		<description>So who are you, Bellweather Johnson? Perhaps you need to start your own sports blog and then I can read Joe&#039;s and yours and then really not get ANYTHING done @ work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who are you, Bellweather Johnson? Perhaps you need to start your own sports blog and then I can read Joe&#8217;s and yours and then really not get ANYTHING done @ work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->