<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kids in the Hall, Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/</link>
	<description>A Rough Draft Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:08:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AaronB</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-46202</link>
		<dc:creator>AaronB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-46202</guid>
		<description>On Hornsby Vs Morgan...

Hornsby, remember, he did play 10 + years for the Cardinals, and actually came back to the Cards at the end of his career for a cup of coffee, leaving them ultimately for a managers spot with the Browns.  

Early in his career he played several positions before ending up at 2cd.  There&#039;s no doubting his reputation, but if it was as bad as we&#039;re making it out to be, I think Branch Rickey would have dealt him much earlier, and he had chances to do that.  

He got traded in part because in 1926, while he guided the Cards to their 1st WS title, he had a down year at the plate.  That, coupled with Rickey&#039;s notorious dumping of players while their value was high, and the fact that he wasn&#039;t the easiest player to get along with all contributed to the trade.  

It did not go over well, but the Cards did turn it into Frankie Frisch, who also should be in this discussion as one of the best 2B ever to play the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Hornsby Vs Morgan&#8230;</p>
<p>Hornsby, remember, he did play 10 + years for the Cardinals, and actually came back to the Cards at the end of his career for a cup of coffee, leaving them ultimately for a managers spot with the Browns.  </p>
<p>Early in his career he played several positions before ending up at 2cd.  There&#8217;s no doubting his reputation, but if it was as bad as we&#8217;re making it out to be, I think Branch Rickey would have dealt him much earlier, and he had chances to do that.  </p>
<p>He got traded in part because in 1926, while he guided the Cards to their 1st WS title, he had a down year at the plate.  That, coupled with Rickey&#8217;s notorious dumping of players while their value was high, and the fact that he wasn&#8217;t the easiest player to get along with all contributed to the trade.  </p>
<p>It did not go over well, but the Cards did turn it into Frankie Frisch, who also should be in this discussion as one of the best 2B ever to play the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Aronson</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45959</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Aronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 00:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45959</guid>
		<description>And since it came up in the HOF discussion, how&#039;s this for career splits:
  Home, .294/.364/.515/.880, 195 HR, 132 Doubles.
 Away: .320/.388/.572/.960, 232 HR, 212 Doubles.

And, just for fun, in Colorado: .374/.421/.695/1.115, 1 HR every 3 games.  Take that, Larry Walker!
The player will be voted on for HOF soon: http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=piazzmi01 and I&#039;ve long held that the worst decision made by a free agent ever was Piazza&#039;s signing the long term contract with the Mets.  At the time, his batting average in Colorado was over .400.  I contend he should have gone to the Rockies on a two year contract for less than going rate, earned his two MVPs, and squashed forever the arguments about whether or not he is a HOF caliber catcher and the best hitting catcher of all time.
And that&#039;s why Jim Rice does not deserve consideration for the HOF.  Piazza has better road splits than Rice&#039;s home splits, better home splits than Rice&#039;s road splits, played half his games in ball parks that cost him 80 points off his OPS instead of playing half his games in a ballpark that earned him 131 points of OPS, and played catcher instead of left field.  And some folks have said publicly that Piazza won&#039;t get their HOF votes.  Well, if Piazza&#039;s not a complete and total lock, Rice doesn&#039;t deserve to get in.

And since I&#039;m ranting, there *is* a good way to use Catcher&#039;s ERA independently of the pitchers throwing the ball.  Simply compare CERA to team ERA.  Parrish, for example, had a great rep with the Detroit teams, but IIRC he consistently had a CERA worse than the team ERA.  Piazza&#039;s CERA was consistently better than his team&#039;s ERA, even with his weak arm.  Calling a great game does not get adequate credit because it&#039;s so hard to find, but Piazza has that going for him as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And since it came up in the HOF discussion, how&#8217;s this for career splits:<br />
  Home, .294/.364/.515/.880, 195 HR, 132 Doubles.<br />
 Away: .320/.388/.572/.960, 232 HR, 212 Doubles.</p>
<p>And, just for fun, in Colorado: .374/.421/.695/1.115, 1 HR every 3 games.  Take that, Larry Walker!<br />
The player will be voted on for HOF soon: <a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=piazzmi01" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=piazzmi01</a> and I&#8217;ve long held that the worst decision made by a free agent ever was Piazza&#8217;s signing the long term contract with the Mets.  At the time, his batting average in Colorado was over .400.  I contend he should have gone to the Rockies on a two year contract for less than going rate, earned his two MVPs, and squashed forever the arguments about whether or not he is a HOF caliber catcher and the best hitting catcher of all time.<br />
And that&#8217;s why Jim Rice does not deserve consideration for the HOF.  Piazza has better road splits than Rice&#8217;s home splits, better home splits than Rice&#8217;s road splits, played half his games in ball parks that cost him 80 points off his OPS instead of playing half his games in a ballpark that earned him 131 points of OPS, and played catcher instead of left field.  And some folks have said publicly that Piazza won&#8217;t get their HOF votes.  Well, if Piazza&#8217;s not a complete and total lock, Rice doesn&#8217;t deserve to get in.</p>
<p>And since I&#8217;m ranting, there *is* a good way to use Catcher&#8217;s ERA independently of the pitchers throwing the ball.  Simply compare CERA to team ERA.  Parrish, for example, had a great rep with the Detroit teams, but IIRC he consistently had a CERA worse than the team ERA.  Piazza&#8217;s CERA was consistently better than his team&#8217;s ERA, even with his weak arm.  Calling a great game does not get adequate credit because it&#8217;s so hard to find, but Piazza has that going for him as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Aronson</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45957</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Aronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 00:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45957</guid>
		<description>Typo time (and only because in an earlier post you suggested you appreciated clear cut clean ups as opposed to half assed opinions without backup).  In Joe Morgan, balot needs another l.

As for the rest of the post, of the batters not in the HOF who have had their chance to get elected (i.e. not Rickey) I&#039;d go with Tim Raines as being most deserving.

As for Jim Lefebvre and his ROY, remember, the Dodgers won 97 games (and eventually the World Series) and he played 157 of them at an important defensive position.  He led the team in home runs.  Nobody on the team slugged .400 (okay, Drysdale did, but none of the hitters did), and nobody got on base at .375, and yet they won it all.  So I imagine Lefebvre got some ROY votes based on arguably being the most valuable hitter on the pennant winner, jobbing Joe Morgan.  It&#039;s worth noting that Lefebvre&#039;s sophomore season was far better for another pennant winner: 24 homers, .460 slugging, OPS+ of 126, and even some MVP votes.  And that was effectively it for him; four average years, two mediocre years, and gone.  One of the wonders of baseball is how somebody peaks at age 24.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo time (and only because in an earlier post you suggested you appreciated clear cut clean ups as opposed to half assed opinions without backup).  In Joe Morgan, balot needs another l.</p>
<p>As for the rest of the post, of the batters not in the HOF who have had their chance to get elected (i.e. not Rickey) I&#8217;d go with Tim Raines as being most deserving.</p>
<p>As for Jim Lefebvre and his ROY, remember, the Dodgers won 97 games (and eventually the World Series) and he played 157 of them at an important defensive position.  He led the team in home runs.  Nobody on the team slugged .400 (okay, Drysdale did, but none of the hitters did), and nobody got on base at .375, and yet they won it all.  So I imagine Lefebvre got some ROY votes based on arguably being the most valuable hitter on the pennant winner, jobbing Joe Morgan.  It&#8217;s worth noting that Lefebvre&#8217;s sophomore season was far better for another pennant winner: 24 homers, .460 slugging, OPS+ of 126, and even some MVP votes.  And that was effectively it for him; four average years, two mediocre years, and gone.  One of the wonders of baseball is how somebody peaks at age 24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeD</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45571</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45571</guid>
		<description>The Puckett/Mattingly comparison has always been an interesting one, but to me it&#039;s less about why Mattingly should be in the Hall as why Puckett probably shouldn&#039;t be in the Hall.  Puckett was admitted because voters &quot;projected&quot; what they thought he might have done if not for his injury (and while it was an odd injury, it was an injury).   People believed he would have achieved 3,000 hits.  Yet why don&#039;t they use that same projection for Mattingly?  If Mattingly hadn&#039;t injured his back, he also would have achieved 3,000 hits.  That&#039;s why projecting is not something a HOF voter should ever use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Puckett/Mattingly comparison has always been an interesting one, but to me it&#8217;s less about why Mattingly should be in the Hall as why Puckett probably shouldn&#8217;t be in the Hall.  Puckett was admitted because voters &#8220;projected&#8221; what they thought he might have done if not for his injury (and while it was an odd injury, it was an injury).   People believed he would have achieved 3,000 hits.  Yet why don&#8217;t they use that same projection for Mattingly?  If Mattingly hadn&#8217;t injured his back, he also would have achieved 3,000 hits.  That&#8217;s why projecting is not something a HOF voter should ever use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45485</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45485</guid>
		<description>Frank White gets &quot;discredited&quot; because he couldn&#039;t hit at all. He&#039;s not in the same league as Whitaker, Randolph or Grich, who were a notch below (but still very good) defensively but weren&#039;t hopeless out machines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank White gets &#8220;discredited&#8221; because he couldn&#8217;t hit at all. He&#8217;s not in the same league as Whitaker, Randolph or Grich, who were a notch below (but still very good) defensively but weren&#8217;t hopeless out machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Blaine</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45414</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Blaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45414</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nor was his grabbing a woman and dragging her into a restroom to feel her up. or threatening to kill his wife.&quot;

I think Kirby cracked under the stress of losing his vision and his baseball career early; he had grown up in the public housing projects of Chicago and had spent his entire adult life playing baseball; I think he imploded psychologically; I think he deserves sympathy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nor was his grabbing a woman and dragging her into a restroom to feel her up. or threatening to kill his wife.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think Kirby cracked under the stress of losing his vision and his baseball career early; he had grown up in the public housing projects of Chicago and had spent his entire adult life playing baseball; I think he imploded psychologically; I think he deserves sympathy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron B-2</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45363</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B-2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 04:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45363</guid>
		<description>Joe, I didn&#039;t grow up in Boston, I&#039;ve never been a member of Red Sox Nation, I was a National Leaguer all the way growing up ... and yet there is something that rings false about your decision not to vote for Jim Rice.

If you will feel happy on the day he is elected to the HOF, then you will feel kind of like a dope on the day AFTER he is elected to the HOF.

I&#039;m just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I didn&#8217;t grow up in Boston, I&#8217;ve never been a member of Red Sox Nation, I was a National Leaguer all the way growing up &#8230; and yet there is something that rings false about your decision not to vote for Jim Rice.</p>
<p>If you will feel happy on the day he is elected to the HOF, then you will feel kind of like a dope on the day AFTER he is elected to the HOF.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Ponzi, Jr</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45352</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Ponzi, Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45352</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;The vast quantity of grace, charm and humility that Kirby exuded in that briefest of exchanges was unforgettable.


Nor was his grabbing a woman and dragging her into a restroom to feel her up. or threatening to kill his wife.

Not that I would consider any of it in a HOF vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;The vast quantity of grace, charm and humility that Kirby exuded in that briefest of exchanges was unforgettable.</p>
<p>Nor was his grabbing a woman and dragging her into a restroom to feel her up. or threatening to kill his wife.</p>
<p>Not that I would consider any of it in a HOF vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Blaine</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45311</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Blaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45311</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to add that I did meet Kirby in person, once, after his career had ended. 

He was coming up the sidewalk, while my son and I were walking down it.

As we approached, my nine-year-old son said, &quot;Hi.&quot; Kirby responded by saying, &quot;How ya doin&#039;, man?&quot; and gave an almost imperceptible smile.

The vast quantity of grace, charm and humility that Kirby exuded in that briefest of exchanges was unforgettable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to add that I did meet Kirby in person, once, after his career had ended. </p>
<p>He was coming up the sidewalk, while my son and I were walking down it.</p>
<p>As we approached, my nine-year-old son said, &#8220;Hi.&#8221; Kirby responded by saying, &#8220;How ya doin&#8217;, man?&#8221; and gave an almost imperceptible smile.</p>
<p>The vast quantity of grace, charm and humility that Kirby exuded in that briefest of exchanges was unforgettable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Blaine</title>
		<link>http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45309</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Blaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/12/17/kids-in-the-hall-part-i/#comment-45309</guid>
		<description>Joe:

I need to take severe exception to your calling into question Kirby Puckettâ€™s HoF credentials over at cnnsi.com!

Kirby reached 2,000 hits at the second fastest pace in history; he hit for power, average, and stole bases; his 1988 season was one of the best of all time; his lifetime BA - .318 - was extraordinarily high; he won six Gold Gloves in centerfield; AND, he led his (small-market) team to two highly improbable World Series victories in five years

On top of all that, he was so charismatic and lovable that he was the de facto King of Minnesota.

Kirby Puckett absolutely deserves to be in the HoF.

How dare you impugn him! Trust me, Bernie Williams was a very good player â€” but he was no Kirby, not by a long shot.

â€“A Minnesota Native</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe:</p>
<p>I need to take severe exception to your calling into question Kirby Puckettâ€™s HoF credentials over at cnnsi.com!</p>
<p>Kirby reached 2,000 hits at the second fastest pace in history; he hit for power, average, and stole bases; his 1988 season was one of the best of all time; his lifetime BA &#8211; .318 &#8211; was extraordinarily high; he won six Gold Gloves in centerfield; AND, he led his (small-market) team to two highly improbable World Series victories in five years</p>
<p>On top of all that, he was so charismatic and lovable that he was the de facto King of Minnesota.</p>
<p>Kirby Puckett absolutely deserves to be in the HoF.</p>
<p>How dare you impugn him! Trust me, Bernie Williams was a very good player â€” but he was no Kirby, not by a long shot.</p>
<p>â€“A Minnesota Native</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->